Main Article Content
Abstract
In this article, we will focus on the loci of interpretation of Kant's thought in which it seems that Heidegger has forced his interpretation. We will concentrate, in particular, on the first interpretation of the Kantian Criticism on which the philosopher lectured in the winter semester 1927/28. Indeed, it is in these lectures that we can observe Heidegger's first attempt to overcome the traditional Kantian metaphysics in favor of his ontology. We believe, in particular, that the concepts of intuition, imagination, and representation are fundamental for the formulation of that ontology. The description of this core of concepts seems, in effect, not only to force the meaning that Kant assigned to each of them, but also gives rise to certain ambiguities that reverberate in the Heideggerian definition of ontology.
Keywords
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of the works published in Studia Heideggeriana. Nevertheless the Sociedad Iberoamericana de Estudios Heideggerianos requires an exclusive grant of commercial rights.
References
- BERTI, Enrico (1985), “Überwindung della metafisica?”, en La metafisica e il problema del suo superamento, Gregoriana, Padova.
- BROAD, Charlie Dunbar (1923), Scientific Thought, Routledge, Londres
- CASSINARI, Flavio (1994) Definizione e rappresentazione. Antropologia e metafisica nell’interpretazione heideggeriana di Kant, Guerini Studio, Milano.
- CAZZULLO, Aldo (1982), Heidegger: immagine e rappresentazione, Unicopli, Milano.
- ELLIOTT, Brian (2005), Phenomenology and Imagination in Husserl and Heidegger, Routledge, London.
- DENKER, Alfred (2000) Historical Dictionary of Heidegger’s Philosophy, the Scarecrow Press, Lanham, Maryland and London.
- GADAMER, Hans-Georg (1983), Heideggers Wege. Studien zum Spätwerk, Mohr, Tübingen.
- HEIDEGGER, Martin, GA 1, Das Realitätsproblem in der modernen Philosophie, en Frühe Schriften, ed. F. W. v. Herrmann, Frankfurt a.M., Klostermann, 1978.
- HEIDEGGER, Martin, GA 2, Sein und Zeit, ed. F-W. von Herrmann, Niemeyer, Tübingen, 1977.
- HEIDEGGER, Martin, GA 3, Kant und das Problem der Metaphysik, ed. F.-W. v. Herrmann, Frankfurt a.M., Klostermann,1973.
- HEIDEGGER, Martin, GA 9, Kants These über da Sein, en Wegmarken, ed. F.-W. v. Herrmann, Frankfurt a.M., Klostermann 1a ed., 1976.
- HEIDEGGER, Martin, GA 9, Was ist Metaphysik?, en Wegmarken, ed. F.-W. v. Herrmann, Frankfurt a.M., Klostermann, 1976.
- HEIDEGGER, Martin, GA 21, E. Cassirer, Philosophie der symbolischen Formen. 2. Teil: Das mysthische Denken; Logik. Die Frage der Wahrheit, ed. Walter Biemel, Frankfurt a.M., Klostermann, 1976.
- HEIDEGGER, Martin, GA 25, Phänomenologische Interpretation von Kants Kritik der reinen Vernunft, ed. F.W. von Herrmann, Frankfurt a.M., Klostermann, 1977.
- HEIDEGGER, Martin, GA 41, Die Frage nach dem Ding. Zu Kants Lehre von den transzendentalen Grundsätzen, ed. Petra Jaeger, Frankfurt a.M., Klostermann, 1984.
- HUSSERL, Edmund (1975), Logische Untersuchungen. Prolegomena zur reinen Logik, ed. Holstein, Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague.
- SCIACCA, Michele Federico (1950), Filosofia e metafisica, Morcelliana, Brescia.
- STRAWSON, Peter Frederick (1959), Individuals. An Essay in Descriptive Metaphysics, Methuen, Londres.
- VOLPI, Franco (1984), Heidegger e Aristotele, Daphne, Padova.
- VOLPI, Franco (1985), “Heidegger e i Greci”, en Ars Majeutica. Studi in onore di Giuseppe Faggin, Neri Pozza, Vicenza, pp. 223-248;
- VOLPI, Franco (1988), “L’approccio fenomenologico alla storia della filosofia del primo Heidegger“, en Aut Aut, no. 223-224, pp. 203-230
- VOLPI, Franco (1990), “La riabilitazione della dynamis e della enérgheia in Heidegger“, en Aquinas, no. 33, pp. 3-28;
- VOLPI, Franco (1996), La question du logos chez le Jeune Heidegger, en ed. J. F. Courtine, Heidegger 1919-1929. De l’herméneutique de la facticité á la mataphysique du Dasein, Paris.
- VOLPI, Franco (1997), Guida ad Heidegger, Laterza, Roma-Bari.
- WOOD, David (2002), Thinking after Heidegger, Stephen Mulhall, New College, Oxford.
References
BERTI, Enrico (1985), “Überwindung della metafisica?”, en La metafisica e il problema del suo superamento, Gregoriana, Padova.
BROAD, Charlie Dunbar (1923), Scientific Thought, Routledge, Londres
CASSINARI, Flavio (1994) Definizione e rappresentazione. Antropologia e metafisica nell’interpretazione heideggeriana di Kant, Guerini Studio, Milano.
CAZZULLO, Aldo (1982), Heidegger: immagine e rappresentazione, Unicopli, Milano.
ELLIOTT, Brian (2005), Phenomenology and Imagination in Husserl and Heidegger, Routledge, London.
DENKER, Alfred (2000) Historical Dictionary of Heidegger’s Philosophy, the Scarecrow Press, Lanham, Maryland and London.
GADAMER, Hans-Georg (1983), Heideggers Wege. Studien zum Spätwerk, Mohr, Tübingen.
HEIDEGGER, Martin, GA 1, Das Realitätsproblem in der modernen Philosophie, en Frühe Schriften, ed. F. W. v. Herrmann, Frankfurt a.M., Klostermann, 1978.
HEIDEGGER, Martin, GA 2, Sein und Zeit, ed. F-W. von Herrmann, Niemeyer, Tübingen, 1977.
HEIDEGGER, Martin, GA 3, Kant und das Problem der Metaphysik, ed. F.-W. v. Herrmann, Frankfurt a.M., Klostermann,1973.
HEIDEGGER, Martin, GA 9, Kants These über da Sein, en Wegmarken, ed. F.-W. v. Herrmann, Frankfurt a.M., Klostermann 1a ed., 1976.
HEIDEGGER, Martin, GA 9, Was ist Metaphysik?, en Wegmarken, ed. F.-W. v. Herrmann, Frankfurt a.M., Klostermann, 1976.
HEIDEGGER, Martin, GA 21, E. Cassirer, Philosophie der symbolischen Formen. 2. Teil: Das mysthische Denken; Logik. Die Frage der Wahrheit, ed. Walter Biemel, Frankfurt a.M., Klostermann, 1976.
HEIDEGGER, Martin, GA 25, Phänomenologische Interpretation von Kants Kritik der reinen Vernunft, ed. F.W. von Herrmann, Frankfurt a.M., Klostermann, 1977.
HEIDEGGER, Martin, GA 41, Die Frage nach dem Ding. Zu Kants Lehre von den transzendentalen Grundsätzen, ed. Petra Jaeger, Frankfurt a.M., Klostermann, 1984.
HUSSERL, Edmund (1975), Logische Untersuchungen. Prolegomena zur reinen Logik, ed. Holstein, Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague.
SCIACCA, Michele Federico (1950), Filosofia e metafisica, Morcelliana, Brescia.
STRAWSON, Peter Frederick (1959), Individuals. An Essay in Descriptive Metaphysics, Methuen, Londres.
VOLPI, Franco (1984), Heidegger e Aristotele, Daphne, Padova.
VOLPI, Franco (1985), “Heidegger e i Greci”, en Ars Majeutica. Studi in onore di Giuseppe Faggin, Neri Pozza, Vicenza, pp. 223-248;
VOLPI, Franco (1988), “L’approccio fenomenologico alla storia della filosofia del primo Heidegger“, en Aut Aut, no. 223-224, pp. 203-230
VOLPI, Franco (1990), “La riabilitazione della dynamis e della enérgheia in Heidegger“, en Aquinas, no. 33, pp. 3-28;
VOLPI, Franco (1996), La question du logos chez le Jeune Heidegger, en ed. J. F. Courtine, Heidegger 1919-1929. De l’herméneutique de la facticité á la mataphysique du Dasein, Paris.
VOLPI, Franco (1997), Guida ad Heidegger, Laterza, Roma-Bari.
WOOD, David (2002), Thinking after Heidegger, Stephen Mulhall, New College, Oxford.